A judge hears closing arguments in an antitrust case against Google (2024)

A judge hears closing arguments in an antitrust case against Google

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/1248863443/1248863444" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">

  • Transcript

A major antitrust trial over Google's search engine is coming to a close. It boils down to this point: Is Google an illegal monopoly that's pushed out rivals — or is it simply the best search engine?

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

Google has been its own verb for years now. The federal government says that's illegal.

STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:

Oh, well, not the verb itself, but the search engine. The government's antitrust lawsuit accuses Google of creating an illegal monopoly. You could easily Google the company's response, or for that matter, find it on Bing. The company says they simply have the best search engine.

MARTIN: Closing arguments wrap up today. And NPR tech correspondent Dara Kerr has been following the trial and she's here to tell us more about it. Good morning.

DARA KERR, BYLINE: Hello, Michel.

MARTIN: Could you just start by reminding us of what this antitrust lawsuit is all about?

KERR: Yeah. It's hard to downplay just how popular Google search is, right? The company controls about 90% of the global search engine market, so there's no dispute that Google is a monopoly. That in itself is not illegal. But what is illegal is when companies engage in certain practices that ensure no rivals enter the market. And the Justice Department says that is exactly what Google did.

MARTIN: What specifically does the government say Google did to hold onto this monopoly?

KERR: Their case hinges on these exclusive agreements that Google made with device-makers like Apple and Samsung and web browser companies like Mozilla, which runs Firefox. Google pays these companies billions of dollars a year to be the default search engine on their devices. And a lot of people don't even realize Google is the default. The government says these deals make it impossible for competitors to get a leg up. And what that means for consumers like you and me is that we're left with few choices, and Google isn't forced to innovate and make a better product because it's already at the top.

MARTIN: What does Google say?

KERR: Throughout the course of the trial, which lasted 10 weeks, Google said its search engine is superior to all others and that's why it dominates the industry. It also said that if people want to switch to another search engine, they can. They just go into their device's settings, and with a few clicks and swipes they can change the default to DuckDuckGo or Bing or Yahoo.

MARTIN: And tell us about the closing arguments. What have those been like?

KERR: What's been really interesting is that it's not like your courtroom TV drama with lawyers making long speeches. Instead, the judge is going back and forth between the lawyers, asking really pointed questions. He's asking about the technology and legal explanations on how Google is or is not violating the law.

The judge also seemed to be trying to poke holes in both-sides arguments. So when Google said a site like Amazon is its competitor when people search for products to buy, the judge made it clear he didn't think Google and Amazon were comparable. And when the government said Google hasn't kept up with innovating its search engine, the judge disagreed. So the judge has really given no indication on which way he'll side.

MARTIN: Has the judge given any indication or do we have any sense of when the judge might issue his decision?

KERR: Yeah, that is expected in a few months. And if he finds that Google acted illegally, there'll be a separate hearing on how he'd sanction the company. That could be anything from fines to restructuring Google, such as breaking up the company. So this decision has the real potential to change how we experience the internet.

MARTIN: That is NPR's Dara Kerr. Dara, thank you.

KERR: Thanks so much.

MARTIN: And here's where I want to let you know Google is a corporate sponsor of NPR, although we cover them like any other company.

Copyright © 2024 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

A judge hears closing arguments in an antitrust case against Google (2024)

FAQs

Who is the judge in the Google antitrust case? ›

The lawsuit seeks primarily to break up Google's digital advertising business to allow for more competition. U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Alexandria, Virginia, made the ruling on Friday and scheduled the non-jury trial for Sept. 9, when she will hear arguments to decide the case directly.

Who was the judge in the landmark antitrust case grills Google justice during closing arguments? ›

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta went back and forth with Google's lead litigator, John Schmidtlein, during the first day of the trial's closing arguments, questioning whether another company could amass the money and data needed to develop a search engine that could eventually compete against Google.

Is the Google antitrust trial over? ›

A landmark antitrust trial against Google concluded on Friday after a federal judge heard final arguments, setting the stage for a ruling that could fundamentally shift the tech industry's power. “The importance and significance of this case is not lost on me, not only for Google but for the public,” Judge Amit P.

How is Google considered a monopoly? ›

WASHINGTON (AP) — Google's preeminence as an internet search engine is an illegal monopoly propped up by more than $20 billion spent each year by the tech giant to lock out competition, Justice Department lawyers argued at the closings of a high-stakes antitrust lawsuit.

Which law firm represents Google? ›

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

Who is the head of the Antitrust Division? ›

Biden nominated Kanter as the DOJ's assistant attorney general for the Antitrust Division in 2021. The Senate confirmed him in a 68-29 vote.

Why is antitrust illegal? ›

The Antitrust Division enforces federal antitrust and competition laws. These laws prohibit anticompetitive conduct and mergers that deprive American consumers, taxpayers, and workers of the benefits of competition.

Is Google in trouble with the government? ›

The U.S. government's landmark antitrust trial against Google's search business is nearing its conclusion. But the parade of major federal cases challenging Big Tech's power is just getting going.

How long do you go to jail for antitrust law? ›

Violating antitrust laws can carry both criminal and civil penalties. Criminal penalties are capped at 10 years of jail time and $100,000,000 per violation.

How did Google violate antitrust laws? ›

The act helps ensure that no single company or firm has control of a particular market. In the case of United States v. Google, the Justice Department argues that Google has unjustly monopolized control of the “ad tech stack,” which is used by advertisers and publishers to buy and sell ads.

Why is Google being sued for monopoly? ›

The Justice Department has accused Google of illegally abusing its power as a monopoly to control the search engine business — leading to competitors being sidelined and customers being shortchanged by getting a lower quality experience.

Does Google have an unfair monopoly? ›

Google as an illegal monopolist will have to pay some penalties,” US federal judge James Donato said Thursday, in a hearing discussing next steps after a jury found the company breached antitrust laws.

Is meta a monopoly? ›

The FTC has no evidence of monopoly power because the alleged monopoly power doesn't exist. The FTC claims that Meta has a “dominant share” of the artificial “personal social networking services market,” but its market share numbers are meaningless without a properly defined market.

Who hears antitrust cases? ›

Both the FTC and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division enforce the federal antitrust laws.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Gregorio Kreiger

Last Updated:

Views: 5499

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (57 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Gregorio Kreiger

Birthday: 1994-12-18

Address: 89212 Tracey Ramp, Sunside, MT 08453-0951

Phone: +9014805370218

Job: Customer Designer

Hobby: Mountain biking, Orienteering, Hiking, Sewing, Backpacking, Mushroom hunting, Backpacking

Introduction: My name is Gregorio Kreiger, I am a tender, brainy, enthusiastic, combative, agreeable, gentle, gentle person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.